Friday 20 February 2015

Does Buying Fair Trade Coffee Help the Poor?




Most of you will have heard of “fair trade” products—“fair trade” coffee being probably the best known. Various Christian and other organizations are active in promoting these products and, more recently, even coffee chains such as Starbucks have joined the effort. What exactly is this movement?  On its website, Fair Trade Canada, one of a world-wide group of such organizations, notes:

Fair Trade is … about making principles of fairness and decency mean something in the marketplace. It seeks to change the terms of trade for the products we buy - to ensure the farmers and artisans behind those products get a better deal. Most often this is understood to mean better prices for producers, but it often means longer-term and more meaningful trading relationships as well.

Since the 1980’s an international system of Fair Trade certification has developed:

Fairtrade certification begins with producers - usually democratic associations of small-scale farmers who grow the raw ingredients in Fairtrade certified products. Producers have to meet a variety of criteria that focus on a range of areas including labour standards, sustainable farming, governance, and democratic participation. ….
The Fair Trade price aims to ensure that producers can cover their average costs of sustainable production. It therefore acts as a safety net for farmers at times when world markets fall below a sustainable level. Without it, farmers are completely at the mercy of the market.

For many Christians supporting such a “just” cause seems self-evident. Certainly to love our neighbor includes the poor—near and far. Nevertheless, if we are to be good stewards, we need to look at the results. Does it really work? Do we really help the poor by buying “Fair Trade” coffee? Victor Claar (a Christian economist currently at Henderson State University in Arkansas but formerly at Hope College, Michigan), in a booklet entitled Fair Trade? Its Prospects as a Poverty Solution[1], suggests that, for all its good intentions, fair trade may not be of help to the poor and may in fact hurt them. In this post, I will set out Claar’s thinking. 

As an aside, I note, that it is one of the benefits of the free market that individuals can band together in non-profit organizations such as those for “fair trade” and participate in the market. All can exercise their market votes as they see fit.


The Fundamental Problem—Too Much Coffee.

Claar’s  major contention (p.51) is that “despite its marvelous intentions, as well as the good-faith monetary contributions that consumers make when they choose higher-priced fair trade coffee over other coffee, Fair Trade will never lead to the long-term enrichment of the poor”.  The basic reason why coffee prices have been too low for coffee growers to make a reasonable living and to pay their workers adequate wages is that there has been simply too much coffee[2]. In fact, some of that excess supply is due to government subsidies in some of the coffee growing countries[3]

Before continuing this point, a brief note on volatility is in order. Coffee prices can fluctuate widely in the short term. On the supply side, God chooses to allow bumper crops and lean years with frost, drought etc. causing significant changes in total production. Lean years cause higher prices but these do not bring out increased production immediately since it takes 2-5 years for new plants to come into production. On the demand side, coffee consumption responds very little to price changes (it is price-inelastic). You are unlikely to drink a few extra cups of coffee because it’s cheap or forego your regular fix because its price is higher. The result is significant variation in prices. To the extent that the fair trade movement ensures some stability in growers’ income with minimum prices, it may help some.

Now getting back to the longer term, if there is too much coffee production, the price of coffee will drop. Eventually, some producers will reduce their acreage and try other crops or businesses; coffee production will fall.  If demand stays the same, prices will eventually rise and some farmers will be able to make a reasonable living. The fair trade movement, however, distorts this normal market movement by masking the price signals. Fair traders, by paying above-market prices, encourage even more people to grow even more coffee.  Fair trade deals act like “golden handcuffs” because it discourages member growers from trying something new.

Moreover, fair trade makes non-fair trade prices fall and thus makes non-fair trade growers poorer. New growers enticed by the higher prices for fair trade coffee create surplus production and falling prices. A further “unintended consequence” of fair trade agreements is that they weaken the incentives of coffee growers to increase the market appeal of their product through quality improvement. Colombia, for example, has improved demand for its beans by improving its quality. Research indicates that coffee drinkers tend to buy first on the basis of quality.

The moral shortcoming of the fair trade movement (p.53) is that “ it keeps the poor shackled to activities that, while productive, will never lead to poverty reduction on a large scale—or even a modest one. Furthermore, if our purchases of fair trade really do retard the long-term rate of poverty reduction, then buying fair trade might rightly be viewed as causing harm.” 

Who gets the money?

Consumers in developed countries voluntarily pay a premium for fair trade coffee. But, does that extra amount really end up with the poor?

In the first place, Claar notes (p.22), the fair trade movement covers only a small proportion of coffee growers. The international organization certifying growers is limited to cooperatives of small coffee growers. Larger plantations are excluded—no matter how well they treat their workers. Moreover, the movement limits the number cooperatives that may join and charges relatively hefty fees for the privilege of membership. “Fair Trade International requires farmers in low-income countries to pay thousands of dollars in order to participate in a network presumably intended to provide poverty relief to its producer organizations.”[4] The restrictions and cost imply that(p.22) “fair trade misses the majority of coffee growers—whether large or small.”

Moreover, Claar writes (p.50) that it is unclear how much of the premium paid for fair trade coffee actually reaches the coffee workers. “Of the extra dollar or two that you pay for a bag of coffee, at least some tiny part remains by the time it travels all the way back through the entire supply chain to the needy growers that you are seeking to serve.”In 2015, he adds[5], “A growing literature suggests that the benefits of fair trade coffee accrue mainly to those in the supply chain who are already well-off by global standards. Apparently, a larger fraction of the retail price of fair-trade coffee remains in the consumer country compared to that fraction for regular coffee. While the gains to the growers are debatable, there is little doubt that the traders and roasters benefit immensely from the fair-trade labeling.

How Might a Caring Christian Respond?

In his final chapter, Claar calls for a “thoughtful, careful and prayerful response”. We must respond to urgent needs not only with speed but also with an understanding of what is needed most and where we can serve most effectively. For the longer term, his answer is the free market. When prices are free to act as signal showing people what to make either more or less of, poor people begin to flourish. Rapid improvement in poverty reduction has occurred in China and India when markets could operate more or less freely;  prices signal us to stop doing the things that pay little and begin doing things that pay more. A key role for concerned Christians, is to permit and even encourage the markets to do the heavy lifting of the poor from poverty. One encouraging tool, he notes, is the Internet and mobile phone access. Rather than relying on greedy middleman, poor growers have access to more potential buyers and accurate information as to current prices. For example, the introduction of internet kiosks in the Indian State of Madhya Pradesh supplied valuable information to soybean farmers and resulted in significantly higher prices to them. It appears to have accomplished more for them than any fair trade program could.

Poor countries grow richer as their human capital (education and relevant experience) grows and as they invest in physical capital: the machines, tools and infrastructure that make the product of each hour of labour more valuable. We need to help poor countries to wisely grow their stock of human and physical labour while remembering that markets and their prices send the best available signals as to where our efforts can have the greatest impact. Examples are micro-lending efforts such as Kiva and Compassion International to further education—the human capital.  

Moreover, economic freedom, the freedom to make personal choices, freedom to buy and sell and the protection of private property is essential. People must become confident that the fruits of their labour cannot be taken away arbitrarily or by force. Working towards basic human rights plays a critical role. 

Finally, Claar notes that we must work domestically to get rid of protectionist agricultural policies of already rich nations. The poor in many nations simply cannot compete with American growers of many crops because the trade rules are “so utterly slanted against those in other nations”. For example, U.S. sugar buyers may not purchase their sugar from outside the U.S.-- although the world price is lower than the government mandated minimum price for sugar. A great deal for U.S. sugar beet growers at the cost of poor sugar producers elsewhere (and the American consumers of sugar, confections and soft-drinks)! Similar barriers exist for peanuts, cotton and other products (as well as in Canada with its dairy marketing boards).

Recommended

Claar makes a convincing case. This inexpensive booklet is well worth reading. If you favour “fair trade” products, you need to read this.


[1] Victor V. Claar, Fair Trade? Its Prospects as a Poverty Solution, Studies in Christian Social Ethics and Economics, Acton Institute, Grand Rapids, Mich.2010.
[2] Prices have been somewhat higher since Claar’s booklet but that doesn’t change the basic argument. If higher prices, in fact, continue, the “fair trade” movement would be obsolete.
[3]  As my former colleague, Rob Harvey, pointed out some time ago in a presentation on this issue at Redeemer University College in Ancaster
[4] Victor v. Claar & Colleen E. Haight, Correspondence, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 2015, p. 215
[5] Ibid.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Hello everyone

We are traders and producers of tropical products such as cashews and soybeans ...
We offer a direct partnership with producers and agricultural associations, which amounts to buying ten times cheaper than the price on the international market.

Email: Hinviroland@protonmail.com
Whatsapp: +22967160036

We remain available for any other information.